US_AFTER_ALL
Interview · Dialogue 04Recorded 19.09.2026 · Berlin-Kreuzberg

Deconstructing the grid: a dialogue on accidental spatial order

A 90-minute recorded conversation with curator and architectural theorist Marcus Chen on how algorithmic fault-lines dismantle modernist structural discipline — in concrete and in memory.

Marcus ChenMarcus Chen
Audio coming soon00:00 / 1:29:45
Q · 04:12 · Elena Rostov — Axiomatic rigor

Marcus, in your recent monograph on non-orthogonal matrices, you argue that the Cartesian grid is not an instrument of order but an administrative fiction. When did that fiction fracture for you in physical space?

A · 04:58 · Marcus Chen

Inside the subterranean drainage tunnels beneath Taipei during the monsoon of 2018. Stand inside a megastructure built on right angles and you realise nature does not negotiate with coordinate systems [1]. Water curves. Shear forces accumulate across micro-fissures. The grid is an ideological overlay on an earth that keeps moving.

“The grid is never neutral. It is a siege engine designed to force irregular human bodies into standardized enclosures.”

Modernism promised that standardised column spacing would free us from feudal hierarchies. What we got was the spreadsheet cast in reinforced concrete: the plan of a high-density estate or a hyperscale data centre is indistinguishable from a fulfilment matrix [2]. We live inside calculated memory addresses.

Plate 01 · Monolithic ascentSt. Agnes, Berlin
Diagonal stairwell inside St. Agnes
Fig. 1 — Formwork seam alignment and the diagonal stairwell shear line inside the abandoned St. Agnes telecommunication node.
Q · 23:44 · Elena Rostov — Monoliths vs the cloud

You draw a violent contrast between the permanence of brutalist monoliths and the supposed weightlessness of cloud storage. Aren't both simply infrastructural cages?

A · 24:19 · Marcus Chen

The difference is honesty. Concrete makes no attempt to disguise its brutality or its extraction. Touch 400 millimetres of poured aggregate and you feel the carbon debit, the tectonic weight, the grain of the formwork pressed into cement.

The cloud, by comparison, is cowardice dressed as grace. Words like 'serverless', 'ambient' and 'air' exist to erase the diesel generators, the cooling turbines and the undersea cables trenching through fragile shelves.

A decaying monolith becomes a ruin that invites plants and birds into its cracks. A dark data facility leaves a shell of composite fibreglass and lithium sludge. We must reclaim the honesty of the heavy monument.

Q · 54:02 · Elena Rostov — Sub-hertz acoustics

Our microphones are picking up a resonance below 20 Hz right now. You chose this bunker for its natural frequency mode. What does the concrete stairwell do to our voices?

A · 54:49 · Marcus Chen

Listen to the decay tail when I stop speaking. The room does not merely reflect sound; it filters out high-frequency politeness. The stairwell behind us works like a subterranean horn.

Video calls gate the room tone away and leave a voice that belongs nowhere. In this void every sentence is anchored to coordinates. You cannot separate a thought from the chamber that contains it.

References

[1] Chen, M. (2021). Subterranean Drainage and Non-Euclidean Fluid Dynamics. Architectural Review of the Pacific Rim, 14(3), 112–129. ↩

[2] Rostov, E. & Vane, K. (2023). The Computational Cage: How Warehouse Logic Colonized European Housing Estates. MIT Press, 45–78. ↩

[3] Banham, R. (1966). The New Brutalism: Ethic or Aesthetic? London: Architectural Press. ↩

Continue

All interviews →